Site-to-Site VPN and Client VPN solve different connectivity problems
Site-to-Site VPN connects a whole on-premises network to a VPC over IPsec tunnels; Client VPN connects individual remote users to AWS resources, a fundamentally different traffic shape.
Speaker notes
- Site-to-Site VPN establishes encrypted IPsec tunnels between a Customer Gateway (your on-premises router/firewall) and a Virtual Private Gateway or Transit Gateway, connecting an entire network to AWS, every device on the on-premises side can reach the VPC without individual configuration. It's the standard backup path for a Direct Connect connection, or a standalone option when Direct Connect's cost and lead time aren't justified.
- Client VPN is architecturally different: it's a managed OpenVPN-based endpoint that individual remote users connect to directly from a laptop, authenticating via Active Directory, SAML, or mutual certificate auth, the AWS equivalent of a traditional remote-access VPN concentrator, not a site-to-site tunnel at all.
- The decision is really about who's connecting, not just bandwidth: an entire branch office's traffic needs Site-to-Site VPN (or Direct Connect); a distributed remote workforce needing individual, authenticated access to internal resources needs Client VPN. Using Site-to-Site VPN to solve a remote-workforce problem means building and maintaining your own concentrator infrastructure that Client VPN already provides managed.
Deck map
01
AWS Networking, end to end
02
The certification landscape: Associate to Professional to Specialty
03
The VPC is the network; everything else attaches to it
04
A subnet lives in exactly one AZ, and that's the whole point
05
The route table decides, the resource doesn't
06
An Internet Gateway makes a subnet public, nothing else does
07
NAT Gateway vs. NAT Instance: managed reliability vs. control
08
Security Groups are stateful, and that's the whole trick
09
Two firewalls, two layers, evaluated in a fixed order
10
Elastic IPs and ENIs: identity that outlives the instance
11
VPC Peering is direct, private, and never transitive
12
Gateway endpoints are free; interface endpoints are PrivateLink
13
ALB, NLB, and Gateway Load Balancer solve different problems
14
Six routing policies, one DNS service
15
CloudFront optimizes what's delivered, not how it travels
16
Shield, WAF, and the edge defense stack
17
VPC Flow Logs: the record of what actually happened
18
Transit Gateway: from N-squared peering to one hub
19
Direct Connect: a physical circuit, not a tunnel
20
Direct Connect resiliency is a model you choose, not a default
21
Direct Connect Gateway: one circuit, many regions
22
Site-to-Site VPN and Client VPN solve different connectivity problems
23
Choosing hybrid connectivity: bandwidth vs. lead time vs. cost
24
Cloud WAN: the network becomes a policy document
25
VPC sharing: one network, many accounts
26
PrivateLink: a service exposed as an ENI, nothing more
27
VPC Lattice moves service networking up to Layer 7
28
PrivateLink vs. VPC Lattice vs. Transit Gateway: the 2026 pattern
29
Route 53 Resolver: DNS that crosses the on-premises boundary
30
Five layers deep: NACL to Shield Advanced
31
Global Accelerator: two static IPs, one fast path
32
Three tools that answer 'why can't this reach that'
33
IPv6 in AWS is additive, not a migration
34
Bandwidth is a design decision, not a given
35
Scenario: a global SaaS platform's hub-and-spoke backbone
36
Scenario: a trading platform's latency and compliance walls
37
Scenario: merging two companies' networks without an outage
38
Scenario: a network that survives losing a region
39
Scenario: exiting a data center without a hard cutover
40
The Advanced Networking Specialty exam, domain by domain
41
The traps that recur across every certification level
42
Quick-fire recall
43
The one-page decision cheat sheet
44
Readiness checklist: is this network actually enterprise-grade?